PRETORIA, A South African judge adjourned until Friday morning a public inquiry into state corruption after lawyers for former President Jacob Zuma said he was being questioned unfairly.
The inquiry is looking into allegations that Zuma, ousted by the ruling African National Congress (ANC) party in February 2018, allowed cronies to plunder state resources and influence senior appointments during his nine years in power.
Zuma’s lawyers have argued that the inquiry’s lawyers should not cross-examine the former president because they say evidence given by other witnesses does not directly implicate Zuma in corruption and fraud.
Chair I hear you, and I appreciate what you’re saying, but I’m really being cross-examined very thoroughly on the details. And I don’t know how come, Zuma told the chairman of the inquiry, deputy chief justice Raymond Zondo in the Wednesday inquiry.
Zuma, 77, has long denied any wrongdoing.
Zuma’s lawyers told Zondo that the former president, who has been testifying since Monday, had been brought to the inquiry under false pretences because he was being cross-examined, whereas he thought he would only have to answer straightforward points of clarity.
The former president has expressed certain concerns, Zondo said. It has been decided that we should adjourn the proceedings for the day, and we should not sit tomorrow (Thursday) in order to give a full opportunity to the commission’s legal team and the former president’s legal team to see whether a way can be found in which his (Zuma’s) concerns are addressed.
State prosecutors have said they are following the corruption inquiry and they could open cases if sufficient evidence of wrongdoing emerges.
Source: NAM News Network